Tag Archives: creativity

Building Cities Out of Song; the Creative Engine of Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Music, a primary cultural cornerstone, plays a transformative role in fostering creativity, collaboration, and risk-taking — traits essential for entrepreneurship and innovation. A 2019 study by the World Economic Forum underscored the symbiotic relationship between the arts and innovation, emphasizing that creativity spurred by artistic engagement improves problem-solving and decision-making. Similarly, the National Endowment for the Arts has highlighted how arts participation correlates with entrepreneurial ventures, noting higher rates of patent filings and business creation among individuals with artistic backgrounds.

“People’s arts participation, as they self-define it, is constantly changing. Through our arts participation strategies, we all become entrepreneurs—conceptualizing new worlds of artistic possibility, defined by the people and for the people.” – Johanna K. Taylor, Associate Professor, The Design School, Arizona State University, with National Endowment for the Arts

Music’s unique ability to cultivate mental agility has been noted by luminaries in both the arts and business. Steve Jobs famously credited Bob Dylan and The Beatles as major influences on his philosophy, stating in a 1995 interview, “Creativity is just connecting things. When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, they just saw something.” This insight reflects music’s power to inspire lateral thinking—finding connections between seemingly unrelated concepts, an essential element of innovation.

‘The world is not static, but constantly changing; indeed, there is always the potential for a variety of future worlds to spring from the ideas and actions of today,’ leading entrepreneurship scholar Saras Sarasvathy (2012). Worldmaking. In A. Corbett and J.A. Katz (Eds.), Entrepreneurial Action (Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 14, pp. 1-24) Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.  ‘The arts are central to this notion of worldmaking. They invite us to consider new realities and test many possible futures through how we choose to participate, experience, create, and perform.’ 

Music in Shaping Industry and Innovation

Detroit and the Auto Industry

Detroit’s influence on the music industry, particularly through Motown Records, is inseparable from its role as the birthplace of modern automotive manufacturing. Motown, founded by Berry Gordy in 1959, was a trailblazer in both music and business. Gordy’s assembly-line approach to producing music mirrored the innovations pioneered by Henry Ford. Gordy’s philosophy, “Don’t look at where you are, look at where you want to be,” encapsulated the city’s industrious spirit and the boldness required to transform ideas into global success stories.

Motown artists like Stevie Wonder and The Supremes not only revolutionized music but also demonstrated the scalability of creative enterprises, providing a blueprint for industries far beyond entertainment. The synergy between music and the auto industry shaped Detroit’s global identity as a city of both creative and industrial ingenuity.

New York and the Financial Industry

In New York City, the frenetic energy of jazz mirrored the high-octane pace of Wall Street. Jazz legends like Duke Ellington and Charlie Parker cultivated an ethos of improvisation and adaptability, qualities that resonate with financial innovation. George Wein, founder of the Newport Jazz Festival, once remarked, “Jazz is the sound of surprise.” This sense of surprise parallels the calculated risks and quick decision-making that characterize the financial sector.

New York’s financial industry thrived on the dynamism of the city’s cultural fabric. Jazz clubs became networking hubs, drawing professionals who found inspiration in the art form’s complexity and unpredictability. The interplay between New York’s cultural and economic sectors has been instrumental in solidifying its reputation as a global capital of innovation.

Silicon Valley and Haight-Ashbury

The countercultural revolution of Haight-Ashbury in San Francisco during the 1960s laid the ideological groundwork for Silicon Valley’s tech boom. Bands like Jefferson Airplane and The Grateful Dead championed an ethos of experimentation and defiance of norms. Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple, drew parallels between this cultural moment and the spirit of technological innovation, echoing Sarasvathy, “Everything we did we were setting the tone for the world.”

The countercultural movement’s embrace of communal living and open collaboration foreshadowed the Valley’s startup ecosystem, where knowledge sharing and partnerships are key. The rebellious energy of Haight-Ashbury echoed in the willingness of tech pioneers to take risks and disrupt industries. By the way, the origin of the iPod? Wozniak, “My first transistor radio was the heart of my gadget love today. It fit in my hand and brought me a world of music 24 / 7.”

More Recently, Let’s Take a Look at Why Austin Emerged

Austin’s richer musical history dates back to the early 20th century, but its transformation into a creative hub began in earnest in the 1960s and 70s. During this period, country and blues artists such as Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings, and Stevie Ray Vaughan emerged as icons of Austin’s music scene. Willie Nelson’s decision to return to Texas in the early 1970s after leaving Nashville signaled a shift in Austin’s identity as a haven for artists seeking authenticity over commercialization. As Nelson put it, “In Austin, I could just be Willie, and the music could be what it needed to be.”

The Armadillo World Headquarters, opened in 1970, became a cultural landmark and a melting pot for genres ranging from rock to progressive country. It was here that Austin’s unique blend of musical influences—rooted in Texas traditions yet open to innovation—gained national attention. As Eddie Wilson, founder of the venue, alluded, ‘The Armadillo was about letting the music be itself. No pretenses.’

By the 1980s, Austin’s reputation as a music city was firmly established, bolstered by venues like Antone’s, which hosted legends such as B.B. King and Muddy Waters. At the same time, Austin was becoming a hub for technological innovation. The founding of Dell in 1984 marked the beginning of the city’s ascent as a tech powerhouse, showing a unique parallel between Austin’s creative and entrepreneurial energies and notice, the approach these artists had toward music reflect the personality and entrepreneurial spirit of Austin today

From 1995 onward, and I want to pause there to make sure your attention is keyed into the fact that 1995 is about the time that the internet reached broad, consumer appeal, from then on Austin cemented its status as the “Live Music Capital of the World.” Festivals like South by Southwest (SXSW), which began in 1987, became global stages for both artists and innovators, “Austin’s magic lies in its ability to bring people together from different disciplines to create something bigger than themselves,” noted Hugh Forrest, SXSW’s Chief Programming Officer.

The period also saw the rise of artists like Spoon and Shakey Graves, alongside challenges for the industry thanks to that pivot of our economy to the internet. The shift to streaming revenue models put immense pressure on musicians, as did Austin’s escalating cost of living. The convergence of these issues spurred the creation of organizations like Black Fret, now Sonic Guild, dedicated to sustaining the city’s musical ecosystem.

Cities Leveraging Music for Growth: Lessons from Manchester and Beyond

Cities like Manchester, England, have successfully tied music to economic development. Manchester’s storied history, from Joy Division to The Stone Roses, has become a cornerstone of its urban branding. The city actively integrates music into its economic strategy, hosting events like Manchester International Festival and Beyond the Music, recently founded by Oli Wilson with Sarah Pearson, to attract global attention. Other cities, including Nashville, Berlin, and Melbourne, follow similar models, using music to foster tourism and community, or course, but more so, to inspire entrepreneurship and local innovation.

“It is more than a city, it’s kind of a way of thinking, it represents a way of life, a philosophy. It’s about economic progress and social progress going together hand-in-hand. Manchester has always been fighting for a better world. Hundreds of years ago it was home of the Suffragettes who fought and won votes for women not just in our country but all over the world.” Manchester Mayor, Andy Burnham at SXSW 2023. “Go back to the American Civil War when Manchester was the cotton capital of the world, it’s the place where ordinary people, workers in those cotton mills, voted that they would not handle slave picked cotton. Think about that, 160 years ago, the working people of Manchester said Black Lives Matter.”

So, I brought up Sonic Guild for reasons that will become apparent. I’ve covered innovation in music by way of Austin before, but we’re nearing 10 years since and much has changed. Exemplifying the entrepreneurial adaptability needed to navigate today’s economic landscape, the patrons of local music initially founded as Black Fret, rebranded to reflect a broader, more inclusive mission of supporting extraordinary new music.

“There are two opposing forces turning the Austin music scene into a crucible with the potential to produce some of the top acts in the country, but only the strongest will survive it. On one hand, Austin’s reputation as a Music city continues to grow and that is attracting more and more of the best artists in the country. So the quality of music in Austin gets better every year, producing bands like the Shakey Graves, the Black Pumas, Dayglo, Rob Baird, and many others. But at the same time, the financial pressures on these artists also continue to grow and may be getting close to a breaking point,” referring to that that affordability challenge I mentioned, Greg Carter, the Operations Director of Sonic Guild Austin, shared some perspective. “For years, streaming has been the primary delivery route for music, so the only way bands can make money is to play live. And with thousands of musicians competing for limited performance slots, the competition is fierce and the pay is low. But Austin’s cost of living continues to climb. What was once seen as one of the most affordable cities for Artists is now rivaling the cost of Cities on the East and West coasts.”

Clearly, a need for innovation thanks to the inspiration of the art. Not surprisingly, Sonic Guild and all non-profits are largely impacted by broader economic forces. During the pandemic when people had lots of time on their hands and few options to spend their money, Sonic Guild had our largest membership base in history and distributed record dollar amounts to music economies throughout the United States. But as the “real” economy has contracted (or struggled with the emergence of AI or the booming expenses) over the past few years, support from members, donors, and sponsors has contracted. While such challenges stifle many philanthropies, it’s in the convergence of music with entrepreneurship that such organizations evolve; hard times make you evaluate your organization, cut the fat, and determine how to maximize your value proposition to all your stakeholders – if I were to call it a startup, I might say pivot. Sonic Guild is going through an evolution based on those learnings and is now in a position to better serve our artists and music businesses, deliver better experiences and value to a broader set of members in different segments, and to enable sponsors to better justify their support based on returns in branding, customer acquisition, and employee attraction & retention.

A glimpse behind their curtain?

  1. More public engagement to build community and provide broader visibility to Sonic Guild artists. For example, the Love Your Music fest at SXSW is open to the public and has been attended by thousands of people over the past few years. This year the Sonic Guild Ball (coming up) opens to the public as well.
  2. Introducing three membership tiers to expand the membership base and better tailor the experience and cost.
  3. Expanding their artist programs to better provide the resources they need to treat their band as a small business and take best advantage of the financial grant to expand their audience and advance their careers.

Sonic Guild’s expansion to cities like Seattle, Colorado, and Northwest Arkansas demonstrates its broader ambition. “The ultimate goal of expanding to cities across the country is to provide meaningful touring support for Sonic Guild bands. It can be very difficult for even very successful local bands to build audiences and create financially successful tours in other cities. Imagine being able to plan a tour that includes opening for popular Sonic Guild bands in all the cities going to and from your anchor gig thousands of miles away,” added Carter. By establishing chapters nationwide, the organization creates opportunities for local musicians to connect with broader audiences, enhancing their ability to build sustainable careers. These chapters also serve as catalysts for innovation, showcasing how music can drive economic and cultural growth.

Imagine, founders and venture capitalists, if lessons are to be learned, we should be looking to Arkansas, Colorado, and Washington for the next big hub of innovation, thanks to the music that leads the way.

If you happen to be in Central Texas, this year the Sonic Guild Ball will be held in just a few days, on Jan 18th at the Long Center. And for the first time ever, it’s open to the public. An amazing night of music and celebration giving away $150,000 in grants to musicians while 10 artists perform.  I want you to get involved more in Austin Music as it’s the fuel behind Austin Startups, so here’s a 20% discount on tickets.

Cities that embrace the arts, especially music, are uniquely positioned to foster entrepreneurship, innovation, and sustainable economic growth. Music is more than entertainment; it’s a driver of mental agility, collaboration, and creative problem-solving—traits that propel industries and define entrepreneurial success. From Detroit’s Motown to Austin’s “Live Music Capital of the World” ethos, history shows us how cultural investment seeds transformative economic identities. Today, the work of organizations like Sonic Guild highlights how aligning music with entrepreneurship can overcome challenges like affordability and shifting revenue models, ensuring both artists and local economies thrive. City leaders, economic developers, and innovators must recognize the value of weaving the arts into their growth strategies. Doing so isn’t just a nod to culture; it’s an investment in a future where creativity, community, and innovation coalesce into boundless opportunity. Let us commit to building cities that, like the music we champion, inspire bold visions and enduring legacies.

Startups Must Be Disruptive

The word “disruption” often evokes a sense of upheaval, and for many startup founders, the idea of creating something that dismantles existing systems can be distasteful. I discovered this distaste most prominently in my relocation from Silicon Valley to Austin, Texas, where the word “disruptive” was treated with disdain; a dirty word that implies founders are ruining things. Rather, founders wanted to be impactful, meaningful, or do something “socially good.” There’s a natural inclination to want to build something positive, something that solves problems without necessarily breaking down what currently exists. However, the reality of innovation dictates otherwise. Disruption is not merely a buzzword but a necessity since all technology eventually becomes commoditized — where it evolves from being revolutionary to freely available, like open-source software. The primary competition that startups face is not from existing businesses or investors who might “steal ideas,” because it’s well known that establish companies can’t (or won’t) take the risks to disrupt their successful models, and investors aren’t entrepreneurs, your primary competition comes from this inevitable progression that continually replaces what exists with automation and innovation.

The Inherent Challenge of Commoditization

Historically, any groundbreaking technology that starts as proprietary, cutting-edge, and valuable becomes commoditized. Consider how operating systems, once tightly controlled by tech giants like Microsoft, are now in competition with freely available Linux distributions. The smartphone once hundreds of dollars is now nearly freely available, unless you’re hooked on a disruptive change such as Motorola’s return to a flip phone in the razr. Cloud services, initially exclusive and expensive, have progressively moved towards being highly accessible and competitively priced by companies such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure. This is the trajectory in technology; what is new and scarce today will be widely available and inexpensive tomorrow.

This relentless march towards commoditization is not limited to software but extends to hardware and intellectual property. The automotive industry, for example, has seen proprietary technologies like anti-lock brakes and fuel injection systems become standard features available across all manufacturers. Hopefully you can appreciate how the assembly line and then robotics, likewise, once revolutionized the production of automobiles but if you were to start a mere car company doing the same thing today, you’re facing a nearly insurmountable battle from what is simply and only the status quo. Your new car company wouldn’t be a startup because it’s a known business model in place within a new company expected to perform as such.

And now we can witness the reality of this thanks to artificial intelligence (AI). What once was an exclusive (and clearly disruptive) domain of a few highly specialized firms, is now accessible through various platforms and open-source frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, and OpenAI. Increasingly freely available, AI continues to disrupt the status quo of both technology and creative oriented sectors of our economy, and yet if you were merely to launch and do the same, you’re already behind.

Peter Thiel notes in his book Zero to One, “All failed companies are the same: they failed to escape competition,” emphasizing the importance of creating monopolistic-type situations through disruption rather than competing in a commoditized marketplace. Indeed, the fact of an actual monopoly is that one exists thanks to the grace of government, and the support of regulation that prevents competition; all a founder can do to thrive against any of these circumstances is Thiel’s monopolistic-like focus that comes from being disruptive. The lesson here is clear: startups must find ways to break the mold and redefine the playing field, not just play within the existing rules.

The Inevitability of Automation

Industries across the board, from manufacturing to services, are undergoing a seismic shift towards automation powered by AI and machine learning. AI is the ultimate disruptive force; it enables startups to do more with less and challenges established players by providing better, faster, and cheaper solutions.

Hopefully an experienced founder already, reading this, you’re familiar with the design thinking principal also known as the Iron Triangle; seen here, traditionally, of cheaper, better, or faster, as a founder, you have to be conscientious of the fact that you can only accomplish two of the three, if you’re lucky. And yet catch what I just shared about the implication of AI, we’ve cracked the code on being better, faster, and cheaper.

The insurance and finance industries offer compelling case studies. Traditionally human-intensive, these sectors are increasingly reliant on AI-driven underwriting, claims processing, and customer service. Startups leveraging AI are not merely offering alternatives to established processes but are fundamentally changing the way these industries operate. Lemonade, an AI-driven insurance startup, is not competing by providing slightly better insurance policies; it is disrupting the entire value chain with instantaneous underwriting and claim settlement processes. If you do a Google Search for “lemonade insurance,” you’ll see evidence of what we’re exploring here, Lemonade’s competition in the insurance industry is aggressively outbidding this disruptive innovation, desperate to retain customer’s attention away from a startup that could well put them all out of business.

Andrew Ng, a pioneer in AI, has often stated that “AI is the new electricity.” This phrase captures how AI is permeating every aspect of business and society, much like electricity did over a century ago. For startups, ignoring this evolution and sticking to incremental improvements of what is already available would be akin to ignoring the advent of electricity itself.

The Distaste for Destruction

Despite the compelling argument for disruption, many founders find the idea of destruction unsettling. This is understandable; there is a certain comfort in creating value without destroying existing systems. Yet, startups that merely aim to solve a problem based on today’s available technologies and resources are at risk of becoming irrelevant before they even get off the ground.

Marc Andreessen, co-founder of Netscape and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, has spoken extensively about this. He coined the phrase “software is eating the world” to describe how every industry is being transformed by software and technology. This transformation is not a gentle evolution but a rapid, often ruthless process of old systems being replaced by new, more efficient ones. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Andreessen stated: “The companies that will succeed are the ones that will destroy something, replace it, and build something new.”

The implication is stark: playing it safe and improving on what exists today is not a path to success. Startups must look to where technology is heading, not where it is. They must be bold enough to disrupt rather than compete within a set paradigm.

Historical Precedents of Disruptive Innovation

Looking back, every significant technological shift has been characterized by disruption rather than incremental improvement. The invention of the personal computer disrupted mainframe computing. The advent of the internet disrupted everything from retail to communication to publishing. Cloud computing disrupted traditional data centers. Each wave of innovation did not simply solve a problem; it rendered existing models obsolete.

When Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone, it wasn’t just a slightly better phone; it was a disruptive force that redefined the entire category of personal electronics. The same can be said of Netflix’s impact on the film and television industry. Reed Hastings, Netflix’s co-founder, wasn’t interested in merely offering a better Blockbuster; he sought to change how people consumed content altogether. As he put it, “The goal is to become HBO faster than HBO can become us.” Netflix disrupted the entire concept of video rental and, later, cable television, and in doing so, it created a new market that it dominates today.

The Futility of Competing Without Disruption

The fundamental reality is that competing in a space defined by today’s technology is futile. Today’s problems will not necessarily be tomorrow’s problems, and the tools and resources available will certainly change. Startups that focus on disrupting, on fundamentally changing the status quo, are the ones that have the potential to bring about lasting impact and, consequently, achieve significant success.

A study from the Journal of Business Venturing shows that disruptive startups have a higher probability of achieving market dominance compared to those that focus solely on incremental innovation. The study points out that markets do not reward companies that merely do what is already being done slightly better. Instead, they reward those that create new markets or redefine existing ones. Startups must, therefore, look beyond the horizon and aim for disruption.

Change the World by Disrupting It

Startups, be disruptive or be irrelevant. The world doesn’t need another company that does what another company already does, just a little better. It needs companies that are willing to break molds, challenge conventions, and disrupt the status quo. Elon Musk has often reiterated, “Disruption is not about moving fast and breaking things. It’s about doing things that make the current state of affairs obsolete.”

How? To truly harness the power of disruption, founders must embrace creativity and a broad-based education that goes beyond just science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Entrepreneurs, founders, innovators, inventors, and creatives must be, well, creative. The contrast to STEM in Education is referred to as STEAM, which includes the arts as a fundamental component, and countless industry leaders, executives, academics, and investors, are pointing out that we made a mistake commoditizing public education to standardized technical skills at the expense of what makes humans distinct from technologies. The study of liberal arts fosters critical thinking, empathy, and creativity—qualities that cannot be easily replicated by machines and that are crucial for true innovation. As Jack Ma, co-founder of Alibaba, pointed out, “We need to learn how to teach our kids to be more creative and constructive; only in this way, we can create jobs that machines can never do.” By encouraging founders and teams to engage with the arts, sports, and other human-centric fields, startups can cultivate a mindset that sees beyond the obvious and builds solutions that are not only technologically advanced but also deeply human, ensuring they are not simply replaced by the next wave of technology but are leading it.

For founders willing to embrace this ethos, disrupting what is today by reinforcing creative solutions over practical (already available) options, they do not merely participate in the world’s economic evolution—they drive it forward. Daniel Johnson of Innovation Federal Credit Union once wrote simply; Disruption is a Good Thing. And in embracing it, startups carve out their path to both impact, social impact, and success.

Invention, Creativity, and Innovation are Merely the Gears that Turn a Startup

We’re witnessing throughout the world that our focus on “tech” for the sake of technology skills, and STEM education to support that, is actually failing people.

Don’t be misled… yes, an education in technology will result in a decent job; more so than most University studies which result in poorer job prospects.

I’m referring to the broader economy and societal impact; that tech alone, evident in historically very technical countries, tend not to excel nor sustain their competitive advantage long. Technology, alone, is not innovation, and tech, as a distinction, is not a startup.

Evident in the recent impact of AI, many software engineering, web development, and coding jobs, have just evaporated. This isn’t something unusual or unknown to social scientists – the role of technology is to replace people, particularly in technical roles.

Hence, I was asked, what is the relationship between creativity, innovation, and invention? How does creativity or invention lead to the creation of jobs and opportunities in startups?

Creativity > Invention > Innovation

Perhaps you can agree on that ranking of priority or order:

  • Creativity is required to capably invent
  • Invention is the application of technology
  • Innovation is the adoption of invention

One can’t meaningfully exist without the other and yet it struck me that there is a more meaningful appreciation of creativity, invention, and innovation, in further appreciation how and why marketing enables innovation to create value.

Far too many would-be founders set out with an invention – they have the solution, the prototype, or the MVP, and they’re now seeking the funding to make something of what they’ve invested in developing.

These are the founders who fail. At the startup stage of our economy, a conventional wisdom exists that 90% of all startups fail; frustratingly, because the research into personality types, causes, and priorities, well establishes WHY and HOW startups fail, yet founders still set out to first Build / Solve / Prototype… and then….

They’re backwards. And they’re wrong.

It’s easy to perceive that technology and a product is what changes the economy, for example:

  • The Printing Press replaced copiers
  • Machines replaced farmers
  • Assembly lines replaced tradespeople
  • Robotics replaced builders
  • The Internet replaced knowledge workers
  • The Content Management System replaced website designers
  • AI is replacing a lot of technical skill works

What this neglects is that it isn’t the invention that changes anything, it’s the innovation and adoption in the market. Fail that in favor of your being focused on invention a solution, and you will fail. We know this, yet many disregard it.

Take a look at this flywheel. I love flywheels, having used them before to explain how to raise capital or how to develop an ecosystem:

Asking how Creativity, Innovation, and Invention relate it a little myopic when we just compare them or put them in lists to correlate them. That visual is a valuable way to think about it.

With the gear of an Invention alone, you will not move efficiently.

Creativity and Innovation working upon an invention is what turns a gear into a machine, or rather, part of a machine.

What do we do with this to make a difference?

Consider your startup a car. Full of gears such as this, our invention is merely one small gear among many, and without creativity to pivot, compete, and try, along with market development so that your invention might be innovative, you have a small gear of little consequence.

Still, the car doesn’t go anywhere without the engine of a team, the fuel of passion, the resources of good tires, the mirrors to see where you’ve been and the windows to keep an eye on where you’re going.

Going… where?

Our car has to be on a road and it requires that your startup know which road to take, which turn is best, and which shortcut might help. If you don’t have intel while driving, you’ll hit that construction roadblock up ahead, get stuck in traffic, or discover too late that a bridge has been washed out. This road is marketing, the path on which you’re moving forward, the map to know where to go, and the traffic updates so you can get there as best as possible.

Just ignore the fact that ChatGPT’s Dall-E still can’t spell properly, the image still gets my point across

Drop the gears of invention, innovation, and creativity, in your startup but know that your venture isn’t going anywhere without the components of a car that get it out of the garage and onto the road. Most importantly, for the love of driving, don’t just step on the gas… you have to know where you’re going of your never going to get there.