What Marketing Could Teach Us if We Were Actually Marketing
Jack Ma, speaking at the World Economic Forum in 2019, warned:
“We have to teach our kids something unique, so that a machine can never catch up with us: values, believing, independent thinking, teamwork, care for others—the soft skills—sports, music, painting, arts, to make sure humans are different from machines.”
This sentiment echoes deeply in the current moment, where technology — particularly AI and robotics — seems poised to disrupt every aspect of work. But the root cause of many challenges AI now magnifies lies not in technology itself but in something more fundamental: the unraveling of Marketing.
Marketing, once the engine of business, was gutted by the internet. Here’s how it happened, and why it matters more than ever.
The Fall of Marketing
Before 1995, Marketing wasn’t just about advertising, branding, or lead generation. It was everything related to the market — from understanding customers to shaping products, driving sales, recruiting talent, and finding investors. Marketing leaders often held the reins of entire companies.
Historically, Marketing encompassed all work related to the market. As Peter Drucker famously put it, “Marketing and innovation produce results; all the rest are costs.” Marketing wasn’t just about advertising or sales; it was the framework for understanding whether a business should act, how, and why.
Since the dawn of business, whether known or performed as such or not, through the early 1990s, Marketing steered the strategic direction of companies. CMOs shaped products, led market research, and managed customer relationships. Budgets reflected this importance: Marketing consumed the lion’s share because it delivered the insights and strategies that drove the business.
But the internet arrived, and with it, a seismic shift. The moment of reckoning for many Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) came when young, internet-savvy employees began to wield tools like early SEO and digital ads. Suddenly, these “kids” (I was one of them, so don’t judge my seemingly ageist criticism of myself; what’s true is true) could deliver data-backed results—a 5x return on ad spend, clear customer insights, and actionable strategies—while many CMOs couldn’t even define “click-through rate.”
Rather than embracing this transformation, Marketing executives panicked. To protect their authority, they marginalized the internet as “digital marketing,” relegating it to junior staff or external agencies. Marketing fractured into silos:
- Websites became a tech team’s problem.
- Product development splintered off, prioritizing MVPs and feature creep over market alignment.
- Sales claimed ownership of the customer relationship, sidelining Marketing’s role in research and strategy.
This fragmentation culminated in the rise of the Chief Revenue Officer; a title born out of the perception that Sales — not Marketing — drives revenue. The silo’s fostered the challenge of a Head of Product distinct from being directed by the market; we saw the rise of Lean Startup and focusing on customers, designing solutions because founders *think so* and believe biased confirmation from people who might buy. Websites that failed to really meet the expectations and needs of the market, increasingly pushed for platforms, Content Management Systems, SaaS, and alternatives, that would make a better website, when the marketing team itself should be fully capable of doing just that.
Today, Marketing is often reduced to a support function—branding, lead generation, or content creation. This narrow definition has fueled a vicious cycle:
- Employers hire marketers with superficial skills, who fail to deliver meaningful results.
- Marketers burned out by trying to fix broken systems, leave or adapt to roles where they cannot lead.
- Businesses undervalue Marketing, turning instead to automation or outsourcing.
As Scott Galloway explains in The Four, “Marketing has been forced into a corner, where it’s measured by likes and clicks instead of by how it drives business strategy.”
The Chaos that Followed
By 2010, the fallout was clear:
- SEO became a patchwork of hacks rather than a strategic discipline.
- Content marketing devolved into “content for content’s sake,” driven by the mantra that “content is king.”
- Influencers and growth hackers seized control of the narrative, muddying the waters of what Marketing truly is.
As a result, even venture capitalists — those who should champion strategic market insights — began to advise startups they were “not ready for marketing.” Marketing, once the cornerstone of business, was reduced to promotion and lead generation.
A Lesson in Failure
This collapse of Marketing created a vicious cycle. Employers hired marketers who didn’t know how to market. Real marketers, burned out by trying to fix broken systems, abandoned the field or took on roles where they could no longer effect change.
And now, AI steps into this vacuum. Marketing, stripped of its strategic core, is the first to be automated.
Here’s the paradox: as AI automates transactional tasks—data entry, ad optimization, coding—it’s creating space for humans to focus on what AI cannot do. Jack Ma’s emphasis on creativity, independent thinking, and empathy points to Marketing’s future:
- Storytelling: Crafting narratives that resonate with human experience.
- Market Insight: Using tools like AI to deepen research, not replace it.
- Creativity: Turning data into strategies that surprise and delight.
Philip Kotler, a father of modern Marketing, captures this shift:
“Marketing is no longer about the stuff you make but about the stories you tell.”
We allowed SEO and, later, Influencers to flourish. We dove headfirst into “Content is king” and pushed everyone to think we create content or do podcasts
As a result, VCs who had bad experiences with “marketing” because of people who weren’t actually marketing, starred preaching that you’re “not ready for marketing,” because marketing became only promoting or advertising.
And that’s where we are today.
The majority of consulting and advising I do encounters organizations struggling because Marketing (their marketing) is just brand, getting flyers made, growth, leads, or promotion. And if you aren’t driving sales, you’re failing.
Morons. I mean it. Absolute dumbf**** who are killing their business because they fell into the completely understandable trap, that marketing is a minor role instead of the primary role.
You can’t find a job right now because WE allow half assed promotions, influencers, salespeople, lead gen spam, SEO, and other crap, to teach employers that that is what marketing is. Marketers who actually know what they’re doing, take any job because they (we) need it. We then try to course correct until we feel dead inside from trying to fix the mess, but things don’t change, because the boss won’t listen, while the business languishes. We perpetuate our own lack of good jobs. And the employers understandably perpetuate that because the “marketers” who don’t know what they’re doing (or who aren’t actually marketers), ALSO take any job because they (we) need it, but they hack some positive outcomes, fail to accomplish anything else critical, causing employers to think “marketing” doesn’t work.
And what does this have to do with your question?? As AI and robotics takes a more prominent role in our economy, can we future proof ourselves for jobs?
There is THE bright side.
Technology is replacing the mess. Product is now data driven. Sales is automated. And fundamental coding is being done by AI.
What’s left that makes any business unique and compelling is marketing: storytelling, competitive analysis, market research, and creativity. Jack Ma was right.
We might be able to course correct, but only if more of us DO Marketing. Fix the ignorance. Stop allowing hucksters to claim to be marketers. Stop pretending that we’re in the b.s. lead gen business because our job isn’t selling, it’s everything that makes a business valuable. INCLUDING HIRING THE RIGHT PEOPLE.
And what makes the right people, whether you’re in Sales, an Engineer, or in Finance? What makes the right Marketer when much of what we do can be done with AI? Doing your job WITH AI, along with your humanity, creativity, audience, and influence, YOUR independent thinking, teamwork, and care for others, makes you unique. How? Learn sports, music, painting, and the arts, and DO it, show it, so that we’re not just hiring another human resource replaceable by AI.
The Bright Side
This is our chance to course correct. Technology is automating the busywork — ad optimization, basic coding, and even sales processes, as well as recruiting, accounting, and operations. What remains is the essence of Marketing:
- Storytelling: Crafting narratives that resonate with people.
- Competitive Analysis: Understanding not just what customers want but what competitors are failing to deliver.
- Creativity: Turning insights into compelling, differentiated strategies.
These are the skills that make businesses thrive. These are the skills that will make YOU thrive no matter what your role.
To start, Marketing must reclaim its role as the driver of business strategy so as to expect everyone (from you in engineering to your friend in accounting) to operate in the same manner. To do that…
Redefine Marketing’s Role
Marketing must return to the boardroom, steering decisions about products, markets, and investments. It’s not about driving sales—it’s about creating value.
Reject the Commoditization of Marketing
Stop allowing SEO hacks, influencers, and lead-gen spam to define the field. Marketers must reclaim their expertise, demanding that businesses value strategy over tactics.
Invest in Skills AI Can’t Replace
Empathy, creativity, and cultural intelligence are the future. Businesses should prioritize hiring and developing talent with these strengths.
—
- Stop settling for mediocrity. Refuse to let “influencers” or SEO hacks define Marketing.
- Invest in human skills. Encourage creativity, teamwork, and empathy as core competencies.
- Lead with strategy. Make Marketing the central driver of decision-making once again.
As AI reshapes the job market, this approach isn’t just good business—it’s survival. Marketing must return to its roots, not as a department but as the soul of the enterprise.
Read These, I’m Not Alone in Saying This!
- Scott Galloway, on the fragmentation of Marketing, “The mistake we made was letting Marketing become a cost center instead of the foundation of strategic growth.” (https://www.profgalloway.com)
- Philip Kotler, on Marketing’s purpose, “Marketing is not the art of finding clever ways to dispose of what you make. It is the art of creating genuine customer value.” (Marketing Management, 2016)
- Jack Ma, on the future of work: (World Economic Forum Speech)
- Tom Goodwin, author of Digital Darwinism, “The companies that fail are the ones that treat digital as a channel instead of a shift in how businesses must think.” (Digital Darwinism on Amazon)
- Rory Sutherland, Vice Chairman of Ogilvy, “Data is a useful servant but a terrible master. The real breakthroughs come from creativity and intuition, not spreadsheets.” (Video: Whoever owns the data owns the conversation)
- Seth Godin, marketing pioneer, “People do not buy goods and services. They buy relations, stories, and magic.” (Seth’s Blog)
The rise of AI marks a crossroads. Either Marketing reclaims its role as the strategic engine of business, or it becomes obsolete — and with it, your job – tasks relegated entirely to algorithms. The choice is ours.
By embracing the soft skills Jack Ma championed—values, creativity, and care for others — Marketing can not only survive but thrive. It can lead businesses into an AI-powered future where humanity still matters.
This is on point. As an OG, I just started my own company instead last year. How many do you think plan to do this in the coming years? I think it will be more common
I was laid off in June. Wallowed in my own misery for a few months until unemployment and severance dried up, knew I needed to do something, and I started my own agency. Through all of this, I only took $500 out of my savings, which I replenished a few days ago, and feel good about it. I only have 1 client right now (3 websites), and have enough to pay my bills and spend a little. They’re so happy with our arrangement they signed a full year contract! A few more clients and I’ll be better off than I was in the position I was laid off in – with tons more flexibility.
Good luck with your company!
Good for you! I hope to take on a few freelance clients this coming year, I went with creating a whole product line and company. I wanted a big challenge. after my first year, I lived frugally, took in some help like $15k, but ended with about $8k out of savings. On paper it comes out even or above. I have inventory that is about $25k and all the production stuff needed now. Plus supplies to make another $15k of inventory. I’m debating on wholesale or freelancing to cover the last $8k.
I noticed this when applying and looking for a mentor. anytime I asked about marketing and the options I have as a whole it somehow always went to digital or social media. What do you recommend someone just starting to do in order to course correct for future need? I’m currently on the course of learning Python and HTML5 along with relearning statistics.
Course correct? That’s a tough one but a good question
Take it all into consideration. What do I mean by that?
Well, recruiters don’t know what to do and everything is going digital anyway
Hiring managers and employers don’t understand or don’t agree
Python and HTML5… Why? Seriously, fundamental coding is dead; which is to say the same is rather true of statistics. No offense, just appreciate that those are going away.
Resumes are b.s. and no one legitimately believes them
So then what?
I think you need to SHOW what you’re capable of by doing it for yourself. Do you have a website? Create content? Have large social media presence or email newsletters? Books?
If no … What proof is there that anyone should hire you?
And if yes… Isn’t it apparent that you should be hired in marketing?
My original plan is to learn basic coding and stats with the intent of understanding/practicing the analytical side of marketing better.
I have been down the Hub-spot digital marketing certifications road and got nothing tangible out of it. Im going to take your advice and find projects that showcase my talents.
I currently work as a social media marketer due to finding no other open positions. It’s nice but not what I expected a career in marketing to be.
Thank you for the advice. I hope you have a great new year!
The #1 soft skill, still very much in need? Thinking! Critical #@$%^& thinking. Typing in prompts, and shamelessly and blinding accepting what The AI returns… that’s not going to get anyone anywhere.
But the majority don’t question what they are told, why should they treat AI differently?
Mark Simchock Critical thinking – one of those words that everybody uses and few can define — is the key to everything.
If you could fashion one common objective of every college and university, it would be to graduate critical thinkers.
Mark Simchock I’m desperately trying to get the attention of the U.S. Department of Education and maybe Linda McMahon because if we don’t *at least* fix public education to restore critical thinking (removing standardization and restoring the role of debate, communications, history, and civics), we’re screwed.
Ok. I’ve tried to read this entire article, even after coming upon things that I disagreed with. Drucker is that “father of marketing,” hands down. I’ve been a marketing person for 50 years to the point where I operate on instinct.
I’d be happy to discuss this with you at any point, but throughout I found the article was confusing marketing (strategy and analysis) with implementation.
I run my company, a deep tech startup, on marketing, understanding the market landscape as it changes, and how it impacts on what and how we do it.
Thanks.
Jay A. Fraser I’m good, thanks. I find that you increasingly disagree with me. No worries. Amusingly, Jeffrey L Minch and I have disagreed on quite a few things lately and yet here, I seem to have written his favorite
I’m not here to appease everyone; I write because people need to challenge their own way of thinking, and people includes myself – writing is how I get feedback, propose ideas, and think things through; I welcome the disagreement while at the same time I look at the reactions from the community overall.
Paul O’Brien concur. I’d offer instead of soft- skills the phrase high-human skills. Nothing soft or easy about routinely demonstrating these skill.
This is the best thing you have ever written. I am not sure how you picked that title.
It is a useful exercise to ask: “What is marketing?” to accomplished business persons.
You would receive a variety of different answers and yet all of those persons were successful.
The next question would be: “Describe what functions fall under marketing in your company?”
Again, a myriad of different questions.
The answer is that almost every function contributes to marketing.
I was involved for years advising companies who were suffering some difficulty. I would always ask the C suite folks to make a graphic of their sales function and identify all the choke points.
Never once did they look similar. In every instance when they all got on the same wavelength, the company recovered and prospered.
As you aptly describe, nobody really has a common definition of marketing.
While it wasn’t consciously a factor, I can’t deny that this factored into my decision last year to give the finger to corporate America and its near perfect record of letting me down and letting me go because of things other people outside my control did or didn’t do and to go back to my artistic roots and dedicate my energy to my love of street photography and, in particular, candid street photography focused on capturing authentic moments of human interaction. No AI. No web-based tools. Minimal futzing around with the photos after they’re taken aside from cropping.
I will continue to use AI tools to do stuff for myself but my photography is and always will be 100% authentic and human. Except for the dog photos. I can’t resist the pups.
Love this, Paul O’Brien! We see it time and time again placing our Online Business Manager – gotta know how to use the AI/build automation but more importantly, gotta know how to relate to people.
Not just true for marketing. All business functions will need to reevaluate how their human employees add value that AI cannot.
Steve Jennis precisely. My narrative in the article is that all need to learn from what happened to marketing, because of tech, to appreciate that it is happening to them; and ironically, that it’s in fixing marketing (and learning from it) that everyone else will thrive.
Paul O’Brien True, but the misunderstanding of holistic marketing (market-driven strategy) versus minimalist marketing (metrics-driven tactics) has been around since before the Internet. It all comes from the CEO, if they don’t have a sales first and then a marketing background, they tend to focus on tech, product, and metrics rather than listening to customers and deriving a strategy from market feedback. A tech founder often thinks outbound advertising is enough marketing, whereas true marketing is inbound listening, analysis, and strategy formulation that then drives the product roadmap.
Whoa Paul. You were apparently in my head for the last 20 years! The framework of story, insight, creativity is a timely true north for a year that will be see the further adoption of gen AI in every facet of business. Part of the challenge I see is where is the best return on time of application/integration of gen AI as marketer (perhaps next article)
Cheers Lou Friedmann, you might appreciate a previous article rather than a next? Check it out:
https://seobrien.com/why-ai-agents-will-build-the-next-wave-of-startups-the-death-of-marketing-teams
While soft skills are valuable, Gary Marcus, a prominent AI researcher and cognitive scientist, argues that technical literacy remains crucial. He suggests that the future workforce needs a hybrid approach – combining human creativity with deep technical understanding to effectively collaborate with AI systems rather than solely relying on soft skills to stay relevant.
Mark Donnigan I’ve seen some of that, and I’m not entirely convinced, in the sense that most of us won’t. We’re going to have demand for technical expertise but far less than the volume we have now… For example, I can code a bit (a website) but there is no value or need for people to have that technical skill anymore; what remains needed is more sophisticated.
Now, that said…. Tech vs. technical… People certainly need technical acumen